Comments on: Dave Zabriskie Part 1

By: mandy

mandy — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:31:25 +0000

of course people latched onto the ‘viscious’ vs ‘vicious’. awesome. i guess people expect only the best grammar from a brother of the (synthetic. breathable and brightly-colored) cloth.
i wouldn’t venture as far as saying that we cyclists are overly-educated or book-savvy…but we are smarter than some. hell, most of america can’t spell “beijing”. nor do they know that tons of euros still call it “peking”. that’s where duck comes from.

By: f-train

f-train — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:08:33 +0000

I toadally want one of those Chipotle leisure kits.

By: MM

MM — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:53:20 +0000

The ‘viscous’ rumors can go one of two ways. It really depends on the thickness of the rumor to begin with and the operating temperature of that rumor. And if you don’t change your rumor often, it can lead to rumor ’sludging’, and those are hard to make go away.

I am jealous of Z’s Magnum P.I. quality ’stache though…

By: The Reverend Brother Flahute

The Reverend Brother Flahute — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:49:37 +0000

Hey, man … you guys totally spelled “viscous” correctly.

By: The Rev

The Rev — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:46:28 +0000

ifin you wont propur spellin read a dickshunary

By: The Reverend Brother Flahute

The Reverend Brother Flahute — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:56:02 +0000

Oh man … viscous rumors are even worse than vicious ones, because they’re thick and sticky and hard to wash off. Vicious rumors are just mean.

So what’s more viscous? The rumors or the DZNuts?